<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469736</link>
    <description>A declaration under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 could not be rejected after the 30-day period prescribed in the governing CBEC circular. The rejection notice was issued beyond that stipulated time, so the denial of scheme benefit was unsustainable. The rejection notice was held non est, the order rejecting the declaration was set aside, and the assessee was granted consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:01:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1682 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469736</link>
      <description>A declaration under the Service Tax Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme, 2013 could not be rejected after the 30-day period prescribed in the governing CBEC circular. The rejection notice was issued beyond that stipulated time, so the denial of scheme benefit was unsustainable. The rejection notice was held non est, the order rejecting the declaration was set aside, and the assessee was granted consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>