<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hospitals must fulfill post imported conditions to avail the benefit of Exemption notification no. 65/88.cus or 208/82.cus</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16820</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus. for imported medical equipment is conditional and depends on continuing compliance with post-import obligations intended to benefit economically weaker sections. Once the DGHS cancelled the Customs Duty Exemption Certificates for non-fulfilment of those obligations, the hospital ceased to remain entitled to the exemption, and substantial compliance was not accepted in the absence of convincing proof. The Tribunal also rejected alternative exemption claims where the components were imported separately or where the goods were specifically excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:08:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:08:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Hospitals must fulfill post imported conditions to avail the benefit of Exemption notification no. 65/88.cus or 208/82.cus</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16820</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 65/88-Cus. for imported medical equipment is conditional and depends on continuing compliance with post-import obligations intended to benefit economically weaker sections. Once the DGHS cancelled the Customs Duty Exemption Certificates for non-fulfilment of those obligations, the hospital ceased to remain entitled to the exemption, and substantial compliance was not accepted in the absence of convincing proof. The Tribunal also rejected alternative exemption claims where the components were imported separately or where the goods were specifically excluded.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:08:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>