https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794221 Insolvency moratorium and liquidation protections under the IBC do not bar proceedings under the PMLA concerning proceeds of crime. Attachment and physical removal of tainted assets by the ED were held not to be vulnerable before insolvency fora, and the challenge had to be pursued within the PMLA framework. The insolvency fora also lacked jurisdiction to order refund or restitution of monies retained after vacation of attachment, because that issue lay in the PMLA appellate and High Court process. Section 50 notices to customers were likewise not interfered with under IBC jurisdiction. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794221 Insolvency moratorium and liquidation protections under the IBC do not bar proceedings under the PMLA concerning proceeds of crime. Attachment and physical removal of tainted assets by the ED were held not to be vulnerable before insolvency fora, and the challenge had to be pursued within the PMLA framework. The insolvency fora also lacked jurisdiction to order refund or restitution of monies retained after vacation of attachment, because that issue lay in the PMLA appellate and High Court process. Section 50 notices to customers were likewise not interfered with under IBC jurisdiction. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794221