<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 108 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794222</link>
    <description>The remuneration of an interim resolution professional had to be determined from the approved agenda and minutes of the first CoC meeting, which showed a consolidated fee for that role and monthly remuneration only if the professional was later appointed as resolution professional. The later dispute did not convert the approved consolidated amount into a monthly entitlement for the entire tenure, so the quantified remuneration fixation was sustained and the claim for higher monthly payment failed. The tribunal also clarified that fee fixation for insolvency professionals is not insulated by the commercial wisdom doctrine applicable to resolution plan approval, and may be examined on its own merits under the insolvency framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 108 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794222</link>
      <description>The remuneration of an interim resolution professional had to be determined from the approved agenda and minutes of the first CoC meeting, which showed a consolidated fee for that role and monthly remuneration only if the professional was later appointed as resolution professional. The later dispute did not convert the approved consolidated amount into a monthly entitlement for the entire tenure, so the quantified remuneration fixation was sustained and the claim for higher monthly payment failed. The tribunal also clarified that fee fixation for insolvency professionals is not insulated by the commercial wisdom doctrine applicable to resolution plan approval, and may be examined on its own merits under the insolvency framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>