<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 110 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794224</link>
    <description>Aluminium formwork structures with accessories were held classifiable under CTH 76109010 as aluminium construction structures, not under CTH 84806000 as moulds for mineral materials, because temporary shuttering for concrete casting does not answer the HSN concept of a mould. The duty demand based on the Revenue&#039;s classification was therefore rejected. The Tribunal also held that an adjudicating authority cannot enhance customs duty on a certificate of origin objection not raised in the show cause notice, as adjudication must remain confined to the notice. On both grounds, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 110 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794224</link>
      <description>Aluminium formwork structures with accessories were held classifiable under CTH 76109010 as aluminium construction structures, not under CTH 84806000 as moulds for mineral materials, because temporary shuttering for concrete casting does not answer the HSN concept of a mould. The duty demand based on the Revenue&#039;s classification was therefore rejected. The Tribunal also held that an adjudicating authority cannot enhance customs duty on a certificate of origin objection not raised in the show cause notice, as adjudication must remain confined to the notice. On both grounds, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>