<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 113 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794227</link>
    <description>For non-notified goods, the Revenue must affirmatively prove foreign origin before confiscation and penalty can be sustained. Areca nuts are not notified goods under Section 123 of the Customs Act, so the burden remained on the Revenue to establish foreign origin by evidence. On the facts recorded, that burden was not discharged, and mere belief was insufficient. Absolute confiscation could not be sustained and penalty was not imposable, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 113 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794227</link>
      <description>For non-notified goods, the Revenue must affirmatively prove foreign origin before confiscation and penalty can be sustained. Areca nuts are not notified goods under Section 123 of the Customs Act, so the burden remained on the Revenue to establish foreign origin by evidence. On the facts recorded, that burden was not discharged, and mere belief was insufficient. Absolute confiscation could not be sustained and penalty was not imposable, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>