<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 193 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal against the dismissal based on limitation grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and clarified the legal position regarding the dismissal of appeals on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 193 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal against the dismissal based on limitation grounds. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for filing appeals and clarified the legal position regarding the dismissal of appeals on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>