<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794241</link>
    <description>Capital loss on demolition of a factory building was allowed at the claimed figure because the assessee substantiated acquisition of the tenant-constructed building and its inclusion in the block of assets through the cancellation agreement, bank records, ledger accounts, TDS certificate and photographs. The written down value of the relevant block was shown to have increased from the opening balance after the acquisition, and there was no contrary material supporting substitution of that block value on the basis of an alleged mismatch from earlier assessment years. The attempt to reduce the loss by disturbing the opening written down value was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the capital loss as claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794241</link>
      <description>Capital loss on demolition of a factory building was allowed at the claimed figure because the assessee substantiated acquisition of the tenant-constructed building and its inclusion in the block of assets through the cancellation agreement, bank records, ledger accounts, TDS certificate and photographs. The written down value of the relevant block was shown to have increased from the opening balance after the acquisition, and there was no contrary material supporting substitution of that block value on the basis of an alleged mismatch from earlier assessment years. The attempt to reduce the loss by disturbing the opening written down value was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the capital loss as claimed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>