<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 192 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52476</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding three discounts allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals): Quantity trade discounts, bank charges, and price-equalization discount. The Tribunal relied on precedents set by the Apex Court and its own decision in a similar case, affirming the eligibility of quantity trade discounts, exclusion of bank charges from assessable value, and entitlement to price equalization discount. Despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal, no stay order was issued, leading the Tribunal to find no merit in the appeal and reject it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:35:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 192 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52476</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding three discounts allowed by the Commissioner (Appeals): Quantity trade discounts, bank charges, and price-equalization discount. The Tribunal relied on precedents set by the Apex Court and its own decision in a similar case, affirming the eligibility of quantity trade discounts, exclusion of bank charges from assessable value, and entitlement to price equalization discount. Despite the Revenue&#039;s appeal, no stay order was issued, leading the Tribunal to find no merit in the appeal and reject it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52476</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>