<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794253</link>
    <description>Section 153C satisfaction must be recorded immediately after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment; &quot;immediately&quot; was held not to mean merely within a reasonable time. Applying that principle, the HC found a delay of nearly 10 months between completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment and the satisfaction note, which failed the jurisdictional requirement for initiating proceedings. The Court also noted that the cash and jewellery relied on had been seized from the petitioner&#039;s premises and locker, making the delay in recording satisfaction even less justifiable. The impugned notices under Section 153C were therefore invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 139 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794253</link>
      <description>Section 153C satisfaction must be recorded immediately after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment; &quot;immediately&quot; was held not to mean merely within a reasonable time. Applying that principle, the HC found a delay of nearly 10 months between completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment and the satisfaction note, which failed the jurisdictional requirement for initiating proceedings. The Court also noted that the cash and jewellery relied on had been seized from the petitioner&#039;s premises and locker, making the delay in recording satisfaction even less justifiable. The impugned notices under Section 153C were therefore invalid and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>