<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52475</link>
    <description>Declared import value supported by the manufacturer&#039;s invoice cannot be discarded merely because contemporaneous imports of the same goods show higher prices. Under the Customs Valuation Rules, transaction value may be rejected only when the statutory grounds for rejection are established; mere reliance on other invoices is insufficient. On the stated facts, the declared transaction value was not sustainable to reject, and the importer&#039;s valuation position prevailed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:33:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52475</link>
      <description>Declared import value supported by the manufacturer&#039;s invoice cannot be discarded merely because contemporaneous imports of the same goods show higher prices. Under the Customs Valuation Rules, transaction value may be rejected only when the statutory grounds for rejection are established; mere reliance on other invoices is insufficient. On the stated facts, the declared transaction value was not sustainable to reject, and the importer&#039;s valuation position prevailed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>