<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1505 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469726</link>
    <description>Unaccounted on-money receipts from flat sales may be assessed on a reasonable estimate where the material shows the declared price is not the true commercial consideration; the Tribunal accepted the director&#039;s statement as the more reliable basis and sustained the addition only partly, not at the full rate adopted by the Assessing Officer. Unsold flats held by a builder as stock-in-trade were not chargeable to deemed rental income for the relevant period; following binding precedent, such units were taxable as business assets and the later insertion of section 23(5) did not apply. The Revenue succeeded only on the on-money issue, while the notional rent addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1505 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469726</link>
      <description>Unaccounted on-money receipts from flat sales may be assessed on a reasonable estimate where the material shows the declared price is not the true commercial consideration; the Tribunal accepted the director&#039;s statement as the more reliable basis and sustained the addition only partly, not at the full rate adopted by the Assessing Officer. Unsold flats held by a builder as stock-in-trade were not chargeable to deemed rental income for the relevant period; following binding precedent, such units were taxable as business assets and the later insertion of section 23(5) did not apply. The Revenue succeeded only on the on-money issue, while the notional rent addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>