<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 208 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52467</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilised credit of Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) was treated as admissible on export of finished goods. The circular issued by the Board was read as permitting such refund, and entitlement was not lost merely because the exported finished goods were not themselves liable to that additional duty. The departmental objection ran contrary to the express position in the circular, so the refund claim was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:18:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 208 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52467</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilised credit of Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) was treated as admissible on export of finished goods. The circular issued by the Board was read as permitting such refund, and entitlement was not lost merely because the exported finished goods were not themselves liable to that additional duty. The departmental objection ran contrary to the express position in the circular, so the refund claim was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>