https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794133 After remand of a Section 7 insolvency petition for fresh adjudication, earlier interlocutory orders could not be used to restrict later pleadings. Rule 2(19) of the NCLT Rules, 2016 defines pleadings broadly, and Rule 55 is not an absolute bar because further pleadings may be allowed with leave of the Tribunal. In proceedings under Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013, relevant material should ordinarily be permitted on record unless irreparable prejudice is shown. On that basis, refusal to accept an additional affidavit solely by reference to past conduct and the earlier stage was unsustainable, and the affidavit was directed to be taken on record subject to rebuttal. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794133 After remand of a Section 7 insolvency petition for fresh adjudication, earlier interlocutory orders could not be used to restrict later pleadings. Rule 2(19) of the NCLT Rules, 2016 defines pleadings broadly, and Rule 55 is not an absolute bar because further pleadings may be allowed with leave of the Tribunal. In proceedings under Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013, relevant material should ordinarily be permitted on record unless irreparable prejudice is shown. On that basis, refusal to accept an additional affidavit solely by reference to past conduct and the earlier stage was unsustainable, and the affidavit was directed to be taken on record subject to rebuttal. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794133