<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 20 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794134</link>
    <description>A winding up petition is not maintainable where the alleged debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds and liability turns on questions of fact. The company disputed the supply rate, claimed excess payment, and sought reconciliation of accounts, while the petitioner did not effectively rebut that defence by rejoinder. In those circumstances, the claim could not be treated as an admitted debt for winding up purposes, and the parties were left to pursue their rival claims before the proper forum for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 20 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794134</link>
      <description>A winding up petition is not maintainable where the alleged debt is bona fide disputed on substantial grounds and liability turns on questions of fact. The company disputed the supply rate, claimed excess payment, and sought reconciliation of accounts, while the petitioner did not effectively rebut that defence by rejoinder. In those circumstances, the claim could not be treated as an admitted debt for winding up purposes, and the parties were left to pursue their rival claims before the proper forum for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>