<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794142</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s pending representations and pass an appropriate decision within two months. It also ordered that status quo be maintained for three months in relation to the validity of the relevant Served From India Scheme scrips. The operative effect was limited to interim protection and a time-bound administrative decision, without any further substantive adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794142</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s pending representations and pass an appropriate decision within two months. It also ordered that status quo be maintained for three months in relation to the validity of the relevant Served From India Scheme scrips. The operative effect was limited to interim protection and a time-bound administrative decision, without any further substantive adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>