<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the respondents, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The departmental authorities were found to have acted unlawfully by coercing the respondents to reverse Modvat credit without proper assessment, lacking jurisdiction to reassess duty on inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the illegality of these actions and the lack of legal basis for the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ultimately rejecting them. The respondents&#039; actions in re-crediting the reversed amount were deemed to align with restoring actual credit based on duty paying documents, rather than seeking excess credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:07:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 155 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision in favor of the respondents, ruling against the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The departmental authorities were found to have acted unlawfully by coercing the respondents to reverse Modvat credit without proper assessment, lacking jurisdiction to reassess duty on inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the illegality of these actions and the lack of legal basis for the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ultimately rejecting them. The respondents&#039; actions in re-crediting the reversed amount were deemed to align with restoring actual credit based on duty paying documents, rather than seeking excess credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>