<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 42 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794156</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271D could not be sustained because the assessment order under section 143(3) contained no recorded satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings. The assessment was completed by accepting the returned income, with no addition made, and the absence of such satisfaction in the assessment order meant the statutory precondition for penalty was not met. The penalty was therefore directed to be deleted, and the assessee succeeded with the penalty order annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 42 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794156</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271D could not be sustained because the assessment order under section 143(3) contained no recorded satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings. The assessment was completed by accepting the returned income, with no addition made, and the absence of such satisfaction in the assessment order meant the statutory precondition for penalty was not met. The penalty was therefore directed to be deleted, and the assessee succeeded with the penalty order annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>