<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (7) TMI 46 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794160</link>
    <description>Notice under section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-16 was held time-barred because it was issued on 07.04.2022, after the six-year outer limit under the pre-amended section 149(1) had expired on 31.03.2022. The exclusion of time under the provisos to section 149(1) could not revive a notice already beyond the statutory limit for that assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment proceedings founded on the invalid notice were held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (7) TMI 46 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794160</link>
      <description>Notice under section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-16 was held time-barred because it was issued on 07.04.2022, after the six-year outer limit under the pre-amended section 149(1) had expired on 31.03.2022. The exclusion of time under the provisos to section 149(1) could not revive a notice already beyond the statutory limit for that assessment year. On that basis, the reassessment proceedings founded on the invalid notice were held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>