https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794180 An ex parte adjudication under the Karnataka GST regime may be interfered with where the taxpayer was denied a fair opportunity to respond, especially when bona fide reasons and medical circumstances are shown. The alleged GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch was capable of explanation through supporting material, and the denial of that opportunity justified setting aside the order. The adjudication was quashed and the matter restored to the adjudicating authority, with liberty to the taxpayer to file a response and additional documents within the time granted. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794180 An ex parte adjudication under the Karnataka GST regime may be interfered with where the taxpayer was denied a fair opportunity to respond, especially when bona fide reasons and medical circumstances are shown. The alleged GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A mismatch was capable of explanation through supporting material, and the denial of that opportunity justified setting aside the order. The adjudication was quashed and the matter restored to the adjudicating authority, with liberty to the taxpayer to file a response and additional documents within the time granted. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794180