https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794182 The Court declined to examine the tax demand on merits in writ jurisdiction and required the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Because the challenge raised issues needing factual adjudication, including objections to the show-cause notices and adjudication orders, the Court permitted filing of the appeal within three weeks and directed the appellate authority to entertain it without objection on limitation if filed within that period. The order was confined to the peculiar facts of the case and was expressly stated not to operate as a precedent. en-us Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794182 The Court declined to examine the tax demand on merits in writ jurisdiction and required the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Because the challenge raised issues needing factual adjudication, including objections to the show-cause notices and adjudication orders, the Court permitted filing of the appeal within three weeks and directed the appellate authority to entertain it without objection on limitation if filed within that period. The order was confined to the peculiar facts of the case and was expressly stated not to operate as a precedent. Case-Laws GST Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794182