<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 250 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52457</link>
    <description>A revisional authority cannot enlarge the controversy beyond the scope of the show cause notice and the order under revision. Where the original proceedings were confined to penalty for failure to obtain registration and file returns, a revisional order directing payment of service tax, filing of returns, and interest exceeded that limited subject matter and was unsustainable. The order was set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 250 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52457</link>
      <description>A revisional authority cannot enlarge the controversy beyond the scope of the show cause notice and the order under revision. Where the original proceedings were confined to penalty for failure to obtain registration and file returns, a revisional order directing payment of service tax, filing of returns, and interest exceeded that limited subject matter and was unsustainable. The order was set aside and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>