<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory verification procedure governs rejection of country-of-origin certificates before denying preferential customs exemption and related penalties.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101243</link>
    <description>Preferential customs exemption based on a country-of-origin certificate cannot be denied by rejecting the certificate without following the prescribed verification procedure. The Tribunal held that where the law specifies a particular manner for disbelieving or rejecting such a certificate, that procedure alone must be followed, and investigative statements cannot override it. Because the certificate was rejected contrary to clauses 16 and 17 of Annexure-III to Rule 13 of Notification No. 189/2009-Cus (NT) read with Article 24 of the AIFTA Operational Certification Procedures, the consequential duty demand and penalties also failed and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory verification procedure governs rejection of country-of-origin certificates before denying preferential customs exemption and related penalties.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101243</link>
      <description>Preferential customs exemption based on a country-of-origin certificate cannot be denied by rejecting the certificate without following the prescribed verification procedure. The Tribunal held that where the law specifies a particular manner for disbelieving or rejecting such a certificate, that procedure alone must be followed, and investigative statements cannot override it. Because the certificate was rejected contrary to clauses 16 and 17 of Annexure-III to Rule 13 of Notification No. 189/2009-Cus (NT) read with Article 24 of the AIFTA Operational Certification Procedures, the consequential duty demand and penalties also failed and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>