<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1945 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469717</link>
    <description>At the discharge stage, the HC held that prosecution could not continue where procurement decisions were taken by multi-member TEC and CEC bodies, approved by the Director, and the record showed no direct or indirect pecuniary benefit to either applicant. Allegations of diluted tender conditions, rejection of the MIC bid, and a false test report were found unsupported by sufficient material to create grave suspicion. The Court also treated the second applicant&#039;s exoneration in departmental proceedings on the same allegations as a material circumstance. On that limited scrutiny, the applicants were entitled to discharge and the revision applications succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:54:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1945 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469717</link>
      <description>At the discharge stage, the HC held that prosecution could not continue where procurement decisions were taken by multi-member TEC and CEC bodies, approved by the Director, and the record showed no direct or indirect pecuniary benefit to either applicant. Allegations of diluted tender conditions, rejection of the MIC bid, and a false test report were found unsupported by sufficient material to create grave suspicion. The Court also treated the second applicant&#039;s exoneration in departmental proceedings on the same allegations as a material circumstance. On that limited scrutiny, the applicants were entitled to discharge and the revision applications succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>