https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469721 In an appeal concerning bogus purchase additions, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose because the Revenue had not challenged the Commissioner (Appeals)' reduction of the addition to 25%, and the Tribunal's further reduction to 12.5% turned only on estimation. On that basis, the dispute was treated as fact-specific rather than involving a legal issue fit for admission, and the appeal was not admitted. en-us Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469721 In an appeal concerning bogus purchase additions, the Court held that no substantial question of law arose because the Revenue had not challenged the Commissioner (Appeals)' reduction of the addition to 25%, and the Tribunal's further reduction to 12.5% turned only on estimation. On that basis, the dispute was treated as fact-specific rather than involving a legal issue fit for admission, and the appeal was not admitted. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469721