<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 1504 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469707</link>
    <description>Denial of a meaningful opportunity to file documents and obtain a personal hearing was treated as a violation of natural justice. The petitioner had sought additional time to submit voluminous records and asked for a further hearing, but the assessment order was passed without considering that request. The Madras HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:56:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 1504 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469707</link>
      <description>Denial of a meaningful opportunity to file documents and obtain a personal hearing was treated as a violation of natural justice. The petitioner had sought additional time to submit voluminous records and asked for a further hearing, but the assessment order was passed without considering that request. The Madras HC set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after granting a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>