<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 2036 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469706</link>
    <description>In alleged bogus purchase cases, where supplier notices remain unserved or unconfirmed and accommodation bills are inferred, the taxable addition should ordinarily be limited to the profit element embedded in the purchases if sales and business activity are not rejected. Applying that principle, the ITAT Mumbai held that a fair estimate at 10% of the purchase value was sufficient in view of the assessee&#039;s declared gross profit, instead of sustaining 12.5%. The addition was therefore restricted to 10% on the alleged bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 2036 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469706</link>
      <description>In alleged bogus purchase cases, where supplier notices remain unserved or unconfirmed and accommodation bills are inferred, the taxable addition should ordinarily be limited to the profit element embedded in the purchases if sales and business activity are not rejected. Applying that principle, the ITAT Mumbai held that a fair estimate at 10% of the purchase value was sufficient in view of the assessee&#039;s declared gross profit, instead of sustaining 12.5%. The addition was therefore restricted to 10% on the alleged bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>