https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794085 Article 226(2) permits writ jurisdiction where part of the cause of action arises within the Court's territorial limits, and the reach of binding constitutional directions is not confined by State boundaries when implementation is required elsewhere. Statutory registering authorities perform a ministerial function and cannot refuse, ignore, or sit in appeal over directions issued by a Constitutional Court. Where insolvency proceedings and later alienation of secured assets formed one chain of cause of action, the Karnataka registering authorities were bound to give effect to the Bombay High Court's directions, and mandamus lay to compel compliance. en-us Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:22:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794085 Article 226(2) permits writ jurisdiction where part of the cause of action arises within the Court's territorial limits, and the reach of binding constitutional directions is not confined by State boundaries when implementation is required elsewhere. Statutory registering authorities perform a ministerial function and cannot refuse, ignore, or sit in appeal over directions issued by a Constitutional Court. Where insolvency proceedings and later alienation of secured assets formed one chain of cause of action, the Karnataka registering authorities were bound to give effect to the Bombay High Court's directions, and mandamus lay to compel compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794085