<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1487 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794106</link>
    <description>Disallowance computed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added back while computing book profit under Section 115JB, because the HC followed its binding jurisdictional precedent that such an adjustment is not warranted for MAT purposes. The court treated the issue as already settled and not open to reconsideration, so the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1487 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794106</link>
      <description>Disallowance computed under Section 14A read with Rule 8D cannot be added back while computing book profit under Section 115JB, because the HC followed its binding jurisdictional precedent that such an adjustment is not warranted for MAT purposes. The court treated the issue as already settled and not open to reconsideration, so the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>