<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 14A disallowance cannot increase book profit under MAT, with binding precedent closing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101224</link>
    <description>Section 14A disallowance cannot be added to book profit for MAT computation under section 115JB where binding co-ordinate Bench precedent has already settled the issue. The HC followed its earlier decision in Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. and the same view adopted in the taxpayer&#039;s own case, and held that no addition to book profit can be made on the basis of the section 14A disallowance. On that settled position, the Revenue&#039;s proposed questions were treated as concluded against it, and the tax appeal was dismissed for want of any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:22:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 14A disallowance cannot increase book profit under MAT, with binding precedent closing the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101224</link>
      <description>Section 14A disallowance cannot be added to book profit for MAT computation under section 115JB where binding co-ordinate Bench precedent has already settled the issue. The HC followed its earlier decision in Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. and the same view adopted in the taxpayer&#039;s own case, and held that no addition to book profit can be made on the basis of the section 14A disallowance. On that settled position, the Revenue&#039;s proposed questions were treated as concluded against it, and the tax appeal was dismissed for want of any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 07:22:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>