<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 236 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52440</link>
    <description>Where the assessee defaulted in payment of duty and forfeited the fortnightly payment facility, duty for the default period had to be paid only through account current (PLA) under Rule 49 read with Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, and discharge through Cenvat credit was not permitted. The demand was therefore upheld, and no further interference was found necessary with the reduced penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 18:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 236 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52440</link>
      <description>Where the assessee defaulted in payment of duty and forfeited the fortnightly payment facility, duty for the default period had to be paid only through account current (PLA) under Rule 49 read with Rule 173G of the Central Excise Rules, and discharge through Cenvat credit was not permitted. The demand was therefore upheld, and no further interference was found necessary with the reduced penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>