<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1878 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469691</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not automatic merely because an addition for interest income is sustained. Where the assessee&#039;s explanation is found plausible and nothing shows it to be false or incorrect, the issue of taxability remains distinct from concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The mere failure on the taxability question does not by itself establish the basis for penalty. On that reasoning, penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:11:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1878 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469691</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) is not automatic merely because an addition for interest income is sustained. Where the assessee&#039;s explanation is found plausible and nothing shows it to be false or incorrect, the issue of taxability remains distinct from concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The mere failure on the taxability question does not by itself establish the basis for penalty. On that reasoning, penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>