<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1671 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469688</link>
    <description>Under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Dispute Resolution Panel cannot direct fresh verification or remit objections to the Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer; its directions must address the objections before it, so the working capital adjustment direction in that form was not sustainable. The transfer-pricing exercise was also revisited on comparability, with M/s. Dynamatic Technologies Ltd. requiring reconsideration against the assessee&#039;s manufacturing profile and functional similarity, and the arm&#039;s length price to be recomputed accordingly. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh directions and reworking of the transfer-pricing analysis, without any final determination on the merits of the adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 15:35:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1671 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469688</link>
      <description>Under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Dispute Resolution Panel cannot direct fresh verification or remit objections to the Assessing Officer or Transfer Pricing Officer; its directions must address the objections before it, so the working capital adjustment direction in that form was not sustainable. The transfer-pricing exercise was also revisited on comparability, with M/s. Dynamatic Technologies Ltd. requiring reconsideration against the assessee&#039;s manufacturing profile and functional similarity, and the arm&#039;s length price to be recomputed accordingly. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh directions and reworking of the transfer-pricing analysis, without any final determination on the merits of the adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>