<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1483 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469687</link>
    <description>Penalty on co-noticees could not survive once the Tribunal had already set aside the order against the principal noticee, because the foundation for imposing derivative penalty no longer remained. The penalty order against the co-noticees was therefore set aside in their favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:55:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1483 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469687</link>
      <description>Penalty on co-noticees could not survive once the Tribunal had already set aside the order against the principal noticee, because the foundation for imposing derivative penalty no longer remained. The penalty order against the co-noticees was therefore set aside in their favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>