https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794033 Civil court jurisdiction is barred where the substance of the suit challenges SARFAESI measures under the 2002 Act. The plaint here sought partition, a declaration that the mortgage was void, and an injunction against enforcement action, but it was internally inconsistent because it accepted earlier partition and the mortgagor's registered ownership while attacking the mortgage only for a share. Sections 34 and 35 required such objections to be pursued before the DRT and, if necessary, the Appellate Tribunal. The plaint was therefore rightly rejected under Order VII Rule 11, and the challenge to the SARFAESI action failed. en-us Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794033 Civil court jurisdiction is barred where the substance of the suit challenges SARFAESI measures under the 2002 Act. The plaint here sought partition, a declaration that the mortgage was void, and an injunction against enforcement action, but it was internally inconsistent because it accepted earlier partition and the mortgagor's registered ownership while attacking the mortgage only for a share. Sections 34 and 35 required such objections to be pursued before the DRT and, if necessary, the Appellate Tribunal. The plaint was therefore rightly rejected under Order VII Rule 11, and the challenge to the SARFAESI action failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794033