<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 191 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52434</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest on receivables in credit sales should be deducted from the sale price to determine the assessable value. Even though interest was not separately shown in the invoice, it was deemed to be included in the price. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and granted relief to the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) rejection of the claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 191 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52434</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest on receivables in credit sales should be deducted from the sale price to determine the assessable value. Even though interest was not separately shown in the invoice, it was deemed to be included in the price. Relying on previous decisions, the Tribunal allowed the appeals and granted relief to the appellants, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) rejection of the claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>