<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1425 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794044</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for deposit insurance premium was treated as admissible where the record showed tax payment before credit was availed, even though the invoices were issued later. The dispute turned on timing of availment, and the evidence did not support the Revenue&#039;s claim that credit had been taken without payment of tax on the underlying service. On that basis, credit could not be denied merely because the invoices post-dated the tax remittance, and the demand for reversal was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1425 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794044</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on service tax paid for deposit insurance premium was treated as admissible where the record showed tax payment before credit was availed, even though the invoices were issued later. The dispute turned on timing of availment, and the evidence did not support the Revenue&#039;s claim that credit had been taken without payment of tax on the underlying service. On that basis, credit could not be denied merely because the invoices post-dated the tax remittance, and the demand for reversal was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>