<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 176 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52433</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the Commissioner (Appeals) has the authority to remand cases to the original adjudicating authority, despite amendments by the Finance Act, 2001. The decision was influenced by the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in UOI v. Umesh Dhaimode. The appeals were dismissed, and the department&#039;s stay applications were denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:53:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 176 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52433</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai held that the Commissioner (Appeals) has the authority to remand cases to the original adjudicating authority, despite amendments by the Finance Act, 2001. The decision was influenced by the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in UOI v. Umesh Dhaimode. The appeals were dismissed, and the department&#039;s stay applications were denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>