<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794061</link>
    <description>Delay in filing appeals by similarly placed BSNL employees was condoned because comparable delays had already been accepted in identical cases, so the matters were heard on merits. Retrenchment compensation received under the voluntary retirement scheme was treated as retrenchment compensation and held exempt under section 10(10B) in line with earlier Tribunal rulings. Leave encashment was also held exempt under section 10(10AA), with retired BSNL employees under the scheme treated as deemed Central Government employees and the beneficial enhanced exemption limit applied. The rectification application under section 154 was found maintainable because the exemption claims were legally tenable on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1442 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794061</link>
      <description>Delay in filing appeals by similarly placed BSNL employees was condoned because comparable delays had already been accepted in identical cases, so the matters were heard on merits. Retrenchment compensation received under the voluntary retirement scheme was treated as retrenchment compensation and held exempt under section 10(10B) in line with earlier Tribunal rulings. Leave encashment was also held exempt under section 10(10AA), with retired BSNL employees under the scheme treated as deemed Central Government employees and the beneficial enhanced exemption limit applied. The rectification application under section 154 was found maintainable because the exemption claims were legally tenable on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>