<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52430</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to waiver of pre-deposit was found where duty on imported photocopying machines, claimed under Notification No. 53/97-Cus., was disputed for use in an EOU bonded warehouse. The Tribunal accepted that the demand was arguable at the interim stage and that the cited precedent supported the view that duty would arise at the time of debonding. On that basis, recovery was stayed and the stay application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:21:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 190 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52430</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to waiver of pre-deposit was found where duty on imported photocopying machines, claimed under Notification No. 53/97-Cus., was disputed for use in an EOU bonded warehouse. The Tribunal accepted that the demand was arguable at the interim stage and that the cited precedent supported the view that duty would arise at the time of debonding. On that basis, recovery was stayed and the stay application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>