<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793988</link>
    <description>Classification of an activity as taxable service depends on its substance and contractual reality, and non-payment disclosed only in audit can support suppression and invocation of the extended limitation period. Waiver of penalty on reasonable cause does not, by itself, negate the demand or the finding of suppression. A plea of revenue neutrality must be proved with documentary support; where the assessee cannot show that the main contractor&#039;s tax payment covered the disputed receipts, the defence fails. The burden of rebutting taxability is not discharged by mere assertion that the main contractor paid service tax, and liability for taxable maintenance, management and repair services remains enforceable on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:33:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793988</link>
      <description>Classification of an activity as taxable service depends on its substance and contractual reality, and non-payment disclosed only in audit can support suppression and invocation of the extended limitation period. Waiver of penalty on reasonable cause does not, by itself, negate the demand or the finding of suppression. A plea of revenue neutrality must be proved with documentary support; where the assessee cannot show that the main contractor&#039;s tax payment covered the disputed receipts, the defence fails. The burden of rebutting taxability is not discharged by mere assertion that the main contractor paid service tax, and liability for taxable maintenance, management and repair services remains enforceable on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>