https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793989 The SC accepted that its earlier order contained inadvertent errors in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and substituted those paragraphs with revised text. The substituted text reaffirmed that a well-reasoned judgment does not call for interference, that a High Court decision remains binding until it is set aside or overruled by the Supreme Court, and that authorities and the Tribunal cannot disregard binding precedent. The substitution application was accordingly allowed and the miscellaneous application was disposed of. en-us Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:33:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793989 The SC accepted that its earlier order contained inadvertent errors in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and substituted those paragraphs with revised text. The substituted text reaffirmed that a well-reasoned judgment does not call for interference, that a High Court decision remains binding until it is set aside or overruled by the Supreme Court, and that authorities and the Tribunal cannot disregard binding precedent. The substitution application was accordingly allowed and the miscellaneous application was disposed of. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793989