<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1412 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794031</link>
    <description>Writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to file appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal against the impugned orders within six weeks, together with a stay application. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeals and stay application on merits and in accordance with law, and limitation was not to obstruct the appeals if filed within time. The earlier interim protection was continued for a limited period, and no opinion was expressed on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:33:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1412 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794031</link>
      <description>Writ petition was disposed of by granting the petitioner liberty to file appeals before the GST Appellate Tribunal against the impugned orders within six weeks, together with a stay application. The Tribunal was directed to decide the appeals and stay application on merits and in accordance with law, and limitation was not to obstruct the appeals if filed within time. The earlier interim protection was continued for a limited period, and no opinion was expressed on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=794031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>