<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1862 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469664</link>
    <description>A notice issued under section 148 after more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior sanction from the authority specified in section 151(ii). Approval from the Principal Commissioner was not sufficient because it was not the competent authority under the statute. The absence of valid sanction went to the root of jurisdiction, so the reopening was invalid. As the notice itself was void, the reassessment order passed under sections 147 and 144 could not be sustained and was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 22:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1862 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469664</link>
      <description>A notice issued under section 148 after more than three years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior sanction from the authority specified in section 151(ii). Approval from the Principal Commissioner was not sufficient because it was not the competent authority under the statute. The absence of valid sanction went to the root of jurisdiction, so the reopening was invalid. As the notice itself was void, the reassessment order passed under sections 147 and 144 could not be sustained and was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>