<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 164 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52408</link>
    <description>Accumulated Cenvat credit was refundable in cash where, during the quarter for which refund was claimed, the credit could not be utilised against duty on final products; the relevant test was present utilisation capacity, not possible use in later quarters. On the facts, exports under bond and low domestic clearances left the credit unabsorbed, so the refund was admissible on merits. The separate question whether drawback or rebate had also been claimed on the exports could not be resolved on the existing record and was remanded for verification with shipping bills and AR-4s by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 164 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52408</link>
      <description>Accumulated Cenvat credit was refundable in cash where, during the quarter for which refund was claimed, the credit could not be utilised against duty on final products; the relevant test was present utilisation capacity, not possible use in later quarters. On the facts, exports under bond and low domestic clearances left the credit unabsorbed, so the refund was admissible on merits. The separate question whether drawback or rebate had also been claimed on the exports could not be resolved on the existing record and was remanded for verification with shipping bills and AR-4s by the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>