<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793919</link>
    <description>An appeal under section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 must ordinarily be filed within two months, with a further condonable period of one month on sufficient cause. Where the Order-in-Original itself wrongly states that the appeal lies within three months, the assessee may reasonably be misled into filing without a condonation application. The Commissioner (Appeals) should not dismiss such an appeal mechanically without examining whether the procedural lapse was caused by the authority&#039;s own misstatement. In the reported matter, the dismissal of the first appeal was held unsustainable and the case was remanded for consideration of delay condonation and decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793919</link>
      <description>An appeal under section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994 must ordinarily be filed within two months, with a further condonable period of one month on sufficient cause. Where the Order-in-Original itself wrongly states that the appeal lies within three months, the assessee may reasonably be misled into filing without a condonation application. The Commissioner (Appeals) should not dismiss such an appeal mechanically without examining whether the procedural lapse was caused by the authority&#039;s own misstatement. In the reported matter, the dismissal of the first appeal was held unsustainable and the case was remanded for consideration of delay condonation and decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>