https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793924 Section 482 CrPC relief was declined because the allegations disclosed a prima facie case and the issues turned on disputed facts and evidence. The subsequent committee report on damages did not extinguish the criminal case or the PMLA complaint, as its relevance and admissibility were matters for trial. Proceedings against the women accused were also not quashed, since the record prima facie showed their connection with the quarrying concern during the relevant period. Delay, alleged mala fides, and challenges to witness statements did not justify quashing, and the PMLA prosecution remained maintainable despite disputes over the predicate offences. en-us Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:07:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793924 Section 482 CrPC relief was declined because the allegations disclosed a prima facie case and the issues turned on disputed facts and evidence. The subsequent committee report on damages did not extinguish the criminal case or the PMLA complaint, as its relevance and admissibility were matters for trial. Proceedings against the women accused were also not quashed, since the record prima facie showed their connection with the quarrying concern during the relevant period. Delay, alleged mala fides, and challenges to witness statements did not justify quashing, and the PMLA prosecution remained maintainable despite disputes over the predicate offences. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 24 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793924