https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793925 An appeal challenging an order directing reconsideration of a resolution plan and deferring an interlocutory application was held premature. The impugned order did not finally decide the appellant's intervention request or other substantive reliefs, and those issues were left open for consideration when the revised plan was placed before the adjudicating authority after review by the committee of creditors. As the appellant did not challenge the remand of the plan for reconsideration and the alleged grievance depended on future events, no immediate prejudice or crystallised cause of action was shown. The appeal was therefore not maintainable at this stage. en-us Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:07:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793925 An appeal challenging an order directing reconsideration of a resolution plan and deferring an interlocutory application was held premature. The impugned order did not finally decide the appellant's intervention request or other substantive reliefs, and those issues were left open for consideration when the revised plan was placed before the adjudicating authority after review by the committee of creditors. As the appellant did not challenge the remand of the plan for reconsideration and the alleged grievance depended on future events, no immediate prejudice or crystallised cause of action was shown. The appeal was therefore not maintainable at this stage. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793925