<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1832 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469637</link>
    <description>The revenue appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel stated that, under the amended litigation policy, the matter fell within the applicable monetary limit. The court recorded the submission and disposed of the pending application accordingly, without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1832 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469637</link>
      <description>The revenue appeal was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel stated that, under the amended litigation policy, the matter fell within the applicable monetary limit. The court recorded the submission and disposed of the pending application accordingly, without examining the merits of the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>