https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469638 Disputes over internal roads, common areas and the effect of a conveyance clause required factual determination of sanctioned plans, development permissions and title, so they were not suitable for writ adjudication and had to be pursued before the civil court. A private agreement could not override statutory rights under the MOFA framework, and findings in deemed conveyance proceedings would not operate as res judicata in civil litigation. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not prevent the Competent Authority from acting under Section 11 of MOFA, because deemed conveyance is a statutory, non-monetary function enforcing the obligation to convey title. The challenge to the deemed conveyance order therefore failed. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 18:57:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469638 Disputes over internal roads, common areas and the effect of a conveyance clause required factual determination of sanctioned plans, development permissions and title, so they were not suitable for writ adjudication and had to be pursued before the civil court. A private agreement could not override statutory rights under the MOFA framework, and findings in deemed conveyance proceedings would not operate as res judicata in civil litigation. The moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code did not prevent the Competent Authority from acting under Section 11 of MOFA, because deemed conveyance is a statutory, non-monetary function enforcing the obligation to convey title. The challenge to the deemed conveyance order therefore failed. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469638